About the Author
Anjeza Fero, PharmD, RPh, is a pharmacist and professor in the Department of Physiology and Neurobiology at the University of Connecticut in Storrs.
Publication
Article
Pharmacy Times
Author(s):
These options are typically more cost-effective, enhancing patient accessibility
Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune condition driven by an overactive immune system that causes the accelerated production of skin cells, leading to inflamed, thickened patches of skin. It impacts over 3% of adults in the US, which equates to more than 7.5 million individuals.1 Although the exact etiology of psoriasis remains elusive, several factors are recognized as contributors to its onset. For example, psoriasis is influenced by genetic predisposition, as individuals with a family history of the condition face a heightened risk of developing it.
Psoriasis manifests in various forms, including plaque psoriasis, guttate psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, and erythrodermic psoriasis, each with distinct clinical presentations and severity.2 Beyond its physical symptoms, psoriasis can have a profound impact on patients’ quality of life, affecting their emotional well-being, social interactions, and self-esteem. Exacerbations can be triggered by several factors, such as infections, physical or emotional stressors, environmental triggers, discontinuation of systemic corticosteroids, alcohol consumption, smoking, and skin injuries.2
TREATMENT APPROACHES
In addressing the importance of effective treatment modalities, it is crucial to consider both nonpharmacologic interventions and pharmacologic approaches. Treatment for psoriasis typically follows a severity-based algorithm, ensuring appropriate management tailored to the individual’s needs. The severity of psoriasis is often categorized as mild, moderate, or severe, based on factors such as the extent of skin involvement, presence of comorbidities, and impact on quality of life.
In mild cases, topical therapies such as corticosteroids, vitamin D analogues, and calcineurin inhibitors are often sufficient to control symptoms and manage flare-ups. For moderate to severe psoriasis, systemic therapies such as oral medications (eg, methotrexate, acitretin), phototherapy, or biologic agents may be necessary.3
Anjeza Fero, PharmD, RPh, is a pharmacist and professor in the Department of Physiology and Neurobiology at the University of Connecticut in Storrs.
It is important to follow a structured algorithm that ensures systematic assessment and progression to advanced therapies like biologics and biosimilars when necessary. However, the selection of treatment should be tailored to each patient’s needs, considering factors such as disease severity and patient preferences.
Additionally, close monitoring and regular follow-up are essential to assess treatment response and tolerability.
ROLE OF BIOSIMILAR DRUGS IN PSORIASIS
Biosimilars are designed to closely resemble already-approved biological drugs, commonly referred to as reference biologics. They have comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity profiles to the reference product. In treating psoriasis, biosimilars target key cytokines involved in the inflammatory cascade, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-17, or IL-23.4 Table 1 reviews some biosimilar options available for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.
Although biosimilars are similar to reference biologics, they are typically more cost-effective than reference biologics, which enhances patient accessibility. Additionally, clinical studies have shown similar effectiveness and safety between biosimilars and reference biologics in psoriasis treatment. On the other hand, both biologics and biosimilars impose a risk of immunogenicity, which can potentially lead to treatment failure. There are also limited long-term safety and efficacy data compared to reference biologics due to biosimilars’ shorter market presence.5
EVIDENCE-BASED STUDIES: SAFETY AND EFFICACY IN PSORIASIS TREATMENT
A study comparing MSB11022, a biosimilar of adalimumab (Humira; AbbVie), with the reference product in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis yielded significant findings. Overall, both MSB11022 and the reference product demonstrated similar efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity profiles.6 Patients treated with MSB11022 showed improvements in psoriasis symptoms, such as a reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores, comparable to those treated with the reference product adalimumab. Additionally, the incidence of adverse events and immunogenicity rates were similar between the 2 treatment groups. These findings suggest that MSB11022 is a viable alternative to the reference product adalimumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, providing patients and health care providers with more effective treatment options.
In another study comparing infliximab and its biosimilar CT-P13 in patients with psoriasis vulgaris, a comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the safety profile and adverse effects of both medications. The methods involved assessing the incidence and severity of adverse events experienced by patients receiving either infliximab or CT-P13 treatment. The results showed comparable safety profiles between infliximab and its biosimilar CT-P13 in patients with psoriasis vulgaris.7 No significant differences were observed in the incidence or severity of adverse events between the 2 treatment groups. Table 25 reviews common adverse effects of biosimilar treatments in psoriasis.
IMMUNOGENICITY CONCERNS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS Immunogenicity occurs when a biologic medication, including biosimilars, triggers an immune response in the body, resulting in the formation of antidrug antibodies. This process can affect the effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of psoriasis treatment.8
Implications of immunogenicity in biosimilar therapy for psoriasis include the following:
SWITCHING TREATMENTS
Switching from one therapy to another may be considered to potentially improve efficacy, safety, or tolerability between biosimilar agents. However, it is important to note that not all switches may result in improvement, and there are not enough data to provide specific recommendations at this time.9
There are no evidence-based guidelines on the duration between discontinuation of the previous medication and initiation of a new biologic. The timing may vary depending on factors such as the treatment being discontinued, disease severity, response to prior treatment, and provider opinion. Providers should use their clinical judgment and make decisions on a case-by-case basis.
Provider assessment tools for evaluating psoriasis severity include the following:
The management of psoriasis encompasses a diverse array of treatment modalities tailored to individual needs. Biosimilars offer a cost-effective alternative with comparable efficacy to reference biologics, expanding treatment options for patients. However, it is essential to keep in mind potential adverse events associated with biosimilar therapy and to closely monitor patients for any treatment-related complications. Clinicians must remain vigilant in assessing treatment response and adjusting therapy as needed. Moving forward, ongoing research and attentive monitoring will play a critical role in maximizing the effectiveness of biosimilar therapy and improving outcomes for individuals with psoriasis.