Article
Author(s):
Seeing a doctor usually means making an appointment weeks in advance or going to a walk-in clinic, but Forward is different.
Check in, wait 20 minutes, sit in a room for another 15 minutes, have a 10-minute conversation with the doctor, and then, hopefully, walk out with a solution. This describes a typical visit to a primary-care physician's office. But despite our overburdened health care system, trying to make the process more patient-focused and relevant has become a big discussion point recently. So, will things change?
Some attempted solutions have included walk-in clinics, which are aimed at cutting down the wait and allowing patients to avoid having to set up appointments. Another idea is an increase in the number of mid-level practitioners (eg, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) to help ease the burden on physicians for low-risk issues.
Meanwhile, the rise of telemedicine is providing a potentially new way to get patients in contact with their care team from the comfort of their own homes, but one start-up based in San Francisco, California, is seeking to take this to a whole new level. Forward is a start-up that wants to make patients the focus of multiple health endeavors, with care teams catering to their needs, and combining a futuristic-looking clinic with teleservices, all for a flat membership fee,
What sets Forward apart is its embrace of multiple parts of the digital health field, including:
So, what is the big deal? Forward is leaning on its ability to tie together all the data that can be collected from patients using smartphone apps and wearable devices to build a more objective view of their health and take the time to make a more meaningful impact on their health. Recently, Forward has expanded its offices to Los Angeles, California, and it looks poised to keep growing.
The only issue I see with Forward is whether the available technology can meet the data aspect to drive therapeutic interventions. In many ways, Forward is taking a semi-science fiction approach to revitalizing health care that I can get behind. But for a flat fee of $149 a month for such services, I am having a hard time envisioning this rolling out to everyone. It looks instead like a more niche platform for certain patient demographics.