News

Article

Study Results Find Different Mechanisms of Action in 2 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Regimens

The differences between the regimens, anti-PD1/CTLA-4 and anti-PD1/LAG-3, can be used to optimize outcomes for patients with melanoma, particularly in those who develop drug resistance.

New research published in the Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer reveals differences in the mechanisms of action of 2 FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies for advanced melanoma. In patients with advanced melanoma, checkpoint inhibitors that activate the immune system to target cancer cells for destruction have led to more options for patients and improved survival; however, according to the study authors, the anticancer effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens that treat melanoma are still somewhat unknown despite the FDA approvals.

Dermatology skin check up with digital deramatoscope

Image credit: Dusko | stock.adobe.com

Including drugs that target the proteins programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), multiple types of immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved to treat advanced melanoma. In addition, results from clinical trials demonstrated that in combination with other immune checkpoint inhibitors that target the proteins CTLA-4 or LAG-3, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors result in better patient outcomes than when used alone, leading to their approvals to treat advanced melanoma. Further, anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/LAG-3 therapies work in similar ways to stimulate the immune system, but mechanistic differences are likely due to the different cell expression patterns, binding partners, and signaling activity between CTLA-4 and LAG-3.

The study examined the mechanisms of action of anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/LAG-3 treatments in advanced melanoma and identified the subtypes of immune cells that become activated during treatment. The immune system is made up of different types of immune cells that work in collaboration to promote and inhibit immune responses: the primary mediators of the anticancer effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors are T cells, including CD8 cells (cytotoxic T cells that kill tumor or infected cells), CD4 cells (helper T cells that coordinate immune responses between CD8 T cells and other immune cells), and regulatory cells called Tregs (cells that can suppress immune responses).

Using mouse models of melanoma and melanoma brain metastases, the study authors identified the exact immune cells that become activated during treatment and discovered that the 2 immune checkpoint inhibitors combination regimens have different mechanisms of action mediated through different effects on CD4 T cells.

The investigators found that the anti-PD-1/LAG-3 drug combination needed the presence of CD4 T-cells for its anticancer effects in both cutaneous melanoma and brain metastases melanoma, whereas the anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 combination did not require their presence. Further, the anti-PD-1/LAG-3 regimen decreased Treg cell activity and increased CD4 helper T cell activity that led to CD8 T-cell activation, whereas the anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 regimen resulted in the accumulation and the direct activation of more cytotoxic CD8 T cells.

“Many patients exhibit upfront or acquired resistance to standard of care anti-PD-1 or the anti-PD-1+CTLA-4 combination, suggesting there could still be responses to a second line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with a different mechanism of action. These observations are of particular interest in the context of melanoma brain metastases, where additional therapeutic strategies are urgently needed,” said study author Keiran Smalley, PhD, director of the Donald A. Adam Melanoma and Skin Cancer Center of Excellence at Moffitt, in a press release.

Although most research has focused on the significance of CD8 T cell activity to immune checkpoint inhibitor anticancer effects, the current study’s observations support the evidence that CD4 helper T cells also have an important influence on the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors. According to the study authors, these data show the key differences that can be used to further optimize outcomes for patients with melanoma, most notably for those who develop drug resistance.

Reference

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute. Moffitt researchers identify key mechanisms of action differences in 2 immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies for advanced melanoma. News release. December 6, 2023. Accessed December 13, 2023. https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1010331

Related Videos
Anthony Perissinotti, PharmD, BCOP, discusses unmet needs and trends in managing chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with an emphasis on the pivotal role pharmacists play in supporting medication adherence and treatment decisions.
Image Credit: © alenamozhjer - stock.adobe.com
pharmacogenetics testing, adverse drug events, personalized medicine, FDA collaboration, USP partnership, health equity, clinical decision support, laboratory challenges, study design, education, precision medicine, stakeholder perspectives, public comment, Texas Medical Center, DNA double helix
pharmacogenetics challenges, inter-organizational collaboration, dpyd genotype, NCCN guidelines, meta census platform, evidence submission, consensus statements, clinical implementation, pharmacotherapy improvement, collaborative research, pharmacist role, pharmacokinetics focus, clinical topics, genotype-guided therapy, critical thought
Image Credit: © Andrey Popov - stock.adobe.com
Image Credit: © peopleimages.com - stock.adobe.com
TRUST-I and TRUST-II Trials Show Promising Results for Taletrectinib in ROS1+ NSCLC
Image Credit: © Krakenimages.com - stock.adobe.com