Article

Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Still Receive Expensive, Unnecessary Advanced Tests

Tests provide little to no benefit and can increase a breast cancer patient’s financial burden.

Despite recommendations against routine surveillance tests, many asymptomatic women treated for early-stage breast cancer often undergo advanced imaging and tumor-marker tests, recent study found.

“Although ASCO Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend against routine surveillance testing, including advanced imaging for asymptomatic individuals with early-stage breast cancer who have undergone treatment, these costly procedures are frequently performed,” said lead investigator Dr Gary Lyman, breast cancer oncologist, health economist, co-director of the Hutchinson for Cancer Outcomes Research.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) joined with the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) in the Choosing Wisely campaign, to improve the value of patient care by ensuring patients receive tests, procedures, and treatments that are most likely to improve quality of life without burdening them with unnecessary costs.

Several studies show that these advanced tests provide little to no benefit for this patient population, according to the authors. Furthermore, false-positive results can lead to unnecessary procedures, unneeded radiation exposure, misdiagnosis, and even overtreatment.

In the current study, which was presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting in Chicago, investigators examined the records of 2193 early-stage breast cancer patients.

The results of the study showed that 37% of patients received tumor-marker tests during the post-treatment surveillance period, which equates to an average of 2.8 tests per patient. There were 17% of patients who received advanced imaging—–an average of 1.5 images per patient.

Financially, costs for patients administered the advanced procedures were considerably higher than the average $18,403 during the surveillance period.

“During early surveillance following treatment, patients averaged 13.3 physician visits, primarily with oncologists and primary care providers,” Dr Lyman said. “We believe one of the best ways we can help patients reduce their financial burden is for us to reinforce the message with oncologists that these tests have been shown to provide no benefit for this particular group of patients.”

The findings were presented in the poster presentation, “Patterns in provider types and cost of surveillance testing in early-stage breast cancer patients: a regional study.”

Related Videos
Anthony Perissinotti, PharmD, BCOP, discusses unmet needs and trends in managing chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with an emphasis on the pivotal role pharmacists play in supporting medication adherence and treatment decisions.
Image Credit: © alenamozhjer - stock.adobe.com
pharmacogenetics testing, adverse drug events, personalized medicine, FDA collaboration, USP partnership, health equity, clinical decision support, laboratory challenges, study design, education, precision medicine, stakeholder perspectives, public comment, Texas Medical Center, DNA double helix
pharmacogenetics challenges, inter-organizational collaboration, dpyd genotype, NCCN guidelines, meta census platform, evidence submission, consensus statements, clinical implementation, pharmacotherapy improvement, collaborative research, pharmacist role, pharmacokinetics focus, clinical topics, genotype-guided therapy, critical thought
Image Credit: © Andrey Popov - stock.adobe.com
Image Credit: © peopleimages.com - stock.adobe.com
TRUST-I and TRUST-II Trials Show Promising Results for Taletrectinib in ROS1+ NSCLC
World Standards Week 2024: US Pharmacopeia’s Achievements and Future Focus in Pharmacy Standards